Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Executive Office of the Trial Court (August 6, 2025)

August 6, 2025 · Executive Office of the Trial Court · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗

Published August 6, 2025 Audit covers July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Under Diana DiZoglio · 2023–present

In plain English
The audit found that the Trial Court website had accessibility problems, especially for people who rely on zooming, keyboard navigation, or working links.
source
“EOTC’s website was not fully accessible to all website users.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a Massachusetts State Auditor performance audit of the Executive Office of the Trial Court’s website for July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024.

“In accordance with Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor has conducted a performance audit of the Executive Office of the Trial Court (EOTC) for the period July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024.”
Why was it audited?

The auditor wanted to check whether the Trial Court website met common accessibility standards for things like keyboard use, navigation, language, errors, colors, and general usability.

“The purpose of our audit was to determine whether EOTC’s website adhered to the World Wide Web Consortium’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 for user accessibility, keyboard accessibility, navigation accessibility, language accessibility, error identification, and color accessibility.”
Why it matters

Court websites are often how people find legal information and services, so barriers on the site can make it harder for people with disabilities to use the courts.

“Government websites are an important way for the general public to access government information and services.”
What's in it for me?

If you or someone you know has trouble seeing, using a mouse, or navigating websites, these problems could make it harder to get court information online.

“Regarding keyboard accessibility, if functional elements on a webpage cannot be navigated using only keyboard commands, then users with limited motor abilities may be unable to navigate to needed information.”
The bottom line

In the sample the auditor reviewed, 21 of 60 webpages had accessibility issues.

“We determined that 21 (35%) webpages out of our sample of 60 were not in accordance with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG).”
What happens next

The auditor recommended that the Trial Court fix zoom problems, keyboard-only access barriers, and faulty links.

“EOTC should work to resolve accessibility barriers that prevent certain features from being used with only keyboard commands.”
Why it's significant

This report is also significant because the Trial Court refused to participate, which the auditor said broke from past practice.

“The response received to this audit represents a significant deviation from historical practice.”
Jargon, unpacked

WCAG means Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, a set of standards meant to help websites work better for people with disabilities.

“In 1999, the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), an international nongovernmental organization responsible for internet standards, published the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 1.0 to provide guidance on how to make web content more accessible to people with disabilities.”

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

The Executive Office of the Trial Court’s website was not fully accessible to all website users.
data privacyinternal controls

Why it matters: Users with visual impairments or limited motor abilities may be unable to access needed information, and broken or faulty hyperlinks can limit equitable access to critical information and online services.

Standard: World Wide Web Consortium’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1, Success Criterion 1.4.10 Reflow, Success Criterion 2.1.1 Keyboard, and Success Criterion 2.4.5 Multiple Ways. ( Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws; World Wide Web Consortium’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 Success Criterion 1.4.10 Reflow (Level AA); World Wide Web Consortium’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 Success Criterion 2.1.1 Keyboard (Level A); World Wide Web Consortium’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 Success Criterion 2.4.5 Multiple Ways (Level AA) )

3 recommendations
  • EOTC should address the loss of functionality when zoomed to 400%.
  • EOTC should work to resolve accessibility barriers that prevent certain features from being used with only keyboard commands.
  • EOTC should review its webpages to ensure that all hyperlinks lead to intended information and that they provide equitable access to critical information and services that EOTC offers online.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "In a letter to the Office of the State Auditor (OSA) on November 20, 2024 (see Appendix B), EOTC stated that it “respectfully declines to comply with the proposed audit.”"
Auditor: "OSA’s position is that the judiciary is subject to audit as outlined in Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the General Laws."