Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Essex County Sheriff’s Department - A Review of Healthcare and Inmate Deaths (April 18, 2024)

April 18, 2024 · Essex County Sheriff’s Department · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗

Published April 18, 2024 Audit covers July 1, 2019 – June 30, 2021 Under Diana DiZoglio · 2023–present

In plain English
The audit found Essex County Sheriff’s Department handled inmate deaths and healthcare oversight meetings properly, but some inmates did not get required medical exams or sick-call follow-ups on time.
source
“Below is a summary of our findings and recommendations, with links to each page listed.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a Massachusetts State Auditor performance audit of healthcare and inmate deaths at the Essex County Sheriff’s Department for July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2021.

“In accordance with Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor has conducted a performance audit of the Essex County Sheriff’s Department (ECSD) for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2021.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors checked whether the department followed rules for inmate deaths, healthcare oversight meetings, admission screenings, physical exams, and sick-call care.

“The purpose of our audit was to determine the following:”
Why it matters

Delayed medical exams can mean health problems are missed or treated late, which can affect the safety of people in custody.

“If ECSD does not provide its inmates with timely physical examinations, then those inmates with healthcare issues may not have their issues identified and treated in a timely manner or at all.”
What's in it for me?

For the public, this report shows whether a county jail system is meeting basic healthcare responsibilities for people it holds in custody.

“As of June 30, 2021, ECSD had 784 employees who supervised and cared for the inmates in ECSD’s custody.”
The bottom line

The auditor found two main problems: late physical exams and late face-to-face follow-ups on some sick-call requests.

“ECSD did not follow up on all sick call requests in a timely manner.”
What happens next

The auditor recommended stronger monitoring and periodic checks so the healthcare contractor follows timelines for exams and sick-call requests.

“ECSD should conduct periodic evaluations of its internal controls to ensure that its contracted healthcare provider follows up on all sick call requests in a timely manner.”
Why it's significant

The audit projected that hundreds of inmates may have been affected by delays during the audit period.

“Based on this, we are 95% confident that ECSD did not follow up on at least 627 HRFs with face-to-face meetings with QHPs within 24 hours upon receipt.”
Jargon, unpacked

A sick call request is the form an inmate uses to ask for medical, dental, or mental health care.

“According to Wellpath’s “Nonemergency Health Care Requests and Services Policy” (HCD-100_E-07) for ECSD, to request access to healthcare, an inmate completes a Healthcare Request Form (HRF) with the following information: the type of service requested (medical, dental, or mental health); the nature of the problem or request; their personal information, including their name, patient identification number,14 date of birth, and housing unit; and their signature and the date.”

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

The Essex County Sheriff’s Department did not provide required inmate physical examinations on time.
internal controlsrecordkeeping/documentationvendor oversight

Why it matters: Inmates with healthcare issues may not have those issues identified or treated in a timely manner or at all, increasing risk to inmate health and safety.

Standard: Number 1 of Section 11 of ECSD’s “Policy 103 ECSD 220.00 Medical Services” ( Number 1 of Section 11 of ECSD’s “Policy 103 ECSD 220.00 Medical Services” )

1 recommendation
  • ECSD should establish monitoring controls over its physical examination process to ensure timely physical examinations by its contracted healthcare provider.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "That said, we acknowledge that some physical examinations may have been performed outside the 14-day window in light of the factors and conditions referenced above."
Auditor: "We acknowledge ECSD’s commitment to emphasize this matter with staff members at all levels to ensure future compliance and believe doing this will support implementation of this recommendation."
The Essex County Sheriff’s Department did not follow up on all inmate sick call requests on time.
internal controlsrecordkeeping/documentationvendor oversight

Why it matters: Inmates may not have healthcare issues properly resolved in a timely manner or at all.

Standard: Section 6.6 of Wellpath’s “Nonemergency Health Care Requests and Services Policy” (HCD-100_E-07) for ECSD ( Section 6.6 of Wellpath’s “Nonemergency Health Care Requests and Services Policy” (HCD-100_E-07) for ECSD )

2 recommendations
  • ECSD should establish effective monitoring controls over its sick call process.agency: disagreed
  • ECSD should conduct periodic evaluations of its internal controls to ensure timely follow-up on all sick call requests by its contracted healthcare provider.agency: disagreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The Department and its contracted healthcare provider respectfully refute this finding for the reasons set forth in greater detail below [including personally identifiable information related to the inmates who correspond to the 6 sick call requests in question, which is not included in this report]."
Auditor: "Still, we believe our finding to be substantiated and encourage ECSD to conduct periodic evaluations of its internal controls to ensure that its contracted healthcare provider follows up on all sick call requests in a timely manner."