Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Department of Unemployment Assistance

June 15, 2018 · Department of Unemployment Assistance · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗

Published June 15, 2018 Audit covers July 1, 2013 – December 31, 2016 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found that Massachusetts’ unemployment agency did not do enough to collect overdue unemployment insurance payments from employers, including missing chances to recover millions of dollars.
source
“DUA did not properly administer the collection of millions of dollars in UI contributions.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a 2018 Massachusetts State Auditor performance audit of the Department of Unemployment Assistance, covering July 1, 2013 through December 31, 2016.

“In this performance audit, we examined DUA’s process for maximizing the collection of delinquent unemployment insurance (UI) contributions due from businesses with employees working full time, temporarily, or part time on one or more days in any 13 weeks during a calendar year and businesses that pay wages of $1,500 or more in any calendar quarter.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors wanted to see whether DUA was doing all it reasonably could to collect overdue unemployment insurance money from employers.

“DID DUA maximize its collection efforts for delinquent unemployment insurance (UI) contributions due from employers?”
Why it matters

When overdue employer payments are not collected, the state loses money that could help pay unemployment benefits.

“As a result, the Commonwealth is losing the opportunity to receive significant revenue that could be used to fund unemployment benefits.”
What's in it for me?

If you live or work in Massachusetts, this matters because unemployment insurance is the program that helps eligible people financially while they are out of work and looking for a job.

“It provides financial assistance and transitional services to unemployed Massachusetts citizens who are able to work, available to work, and looking for employment, with the goal of helping them become re-employed.”
The bottom line

The auditor concluded that DUA did not properly manage major parts of its debt collection work and missed opportunities to collect overdue money.

“DUA did not intercept over $18 million in payments made by the Commonwealth to state contractors who had delinquent UI contributions.”
What happens next

The auditor recommended that DUA create formal collection rules, monitor whether staff follow them, and connect with the state payment intercept system so overdue employers cannot keep receiving state payments without the debt being addressed.

“DUA should engage with the Payment Intercept Program and put in place an interface with that program to ensure that employers with delinquent UI contributions owed to DUA cannot receive funds from the Commonwealth via approved contracts.”
Why it's significant

This was not a small paperwork issue: auditors estimated hundreds of millions of dollars in overdue employer unemployment insurance contributions and interest, with more than $170 million not referred for collection.

“Specifically, according to its records, DUA did not refer for collection to the Revenue Enforcement Department over $170 million of the $284,453,4209 in delinquent UI payments and interest owed to it as of the end of our audit period, as detailed below.”
Jargon, unpacked

“UI contributions” means unemployment insurance payments employers owe to the state; “delinquent” means overdue; a “payment intercept” means the state holds back money it would otherwise pay someone and uses it to cover debt.

“Another recovery option available to DUA and other state agencies is the Payment Intercept Program, whereby state payments due the employer, including tax refunds, are intercepted and transferred to DUA to pay off delinquent accounts.”

8 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

The Department of Unemployment Assistance did not properly administer collection of delinquent unemployment insurance contributions.
internal controlscash handlingrecordkeeping/documentation

Why it matters: The Commonwealth risked losing significant revenue that could have funded unemployment benefits.

Standard: Section 9.03 of Title 815 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations; Section 16 of Chapter 151A of the Massachusetts General Laws; DUA's Employer Accounts Receivable Process document. ( Section 16 of Chapter 151A of the General Laws )

2 recommendations
  • DUA should establish formal policies and procedures for all activities regarding the administration of its collection process and implement effective monitoring controls to ensure that these policies and procedures are adhered to.agency: agreed
  • DUA's policies and procedures should include charging off or removing delinquent employer accounts where the amount owed is 10 dollars or less.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "DUA acknowledges the impact of manual revenue enforcement processes on its ability to track and collect outstanding UI debt."
Auditor: "Based on its response, DUA plans to take measures to address our concerns in this area."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Department of Unemployment Assistance .

See this entity's page with all 2 audits →