Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Department of Higher Education

August 29, 2018 · Department of Higher Education · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗

Published August 29, 2018 Audit covers July 1, 2014 – June 30, 2016 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The auditor found that the Department of Higher Education needed to better measure whether some student aid programs worked, fix financial management problems, and update its internal controls.
source
“DHE’s administration of its Foster Child Grant Program, Foster Child Tuition Waiver and Fee Assistance Program, and NIL Program needs improvement.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state performance audit of the Massachusetts Department of Higher Education covering selected activities from July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2016.

“This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, findings, and recommendations for the audit period, July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2016.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors checked whether the department measured the success of foster-child aid programs and the No Interest Loan Program, and whether it handled related accounting and controls properly.

“In this audit, we determined whether DHE had a system in place to measure the effectiveness and success of the Foster Child Grant Program, the Foster Child Tuition Waiver and Fee Assistance Program, and the No Interest Loan (NIL) Program.”
Why it matters

If the department does not track outcomes, it cannot tell whether these programs are helping students finish school or whether changes are needed.

“Without performing these important administrative activities, DHE lacks the ability to assess the impact of these programs or the extent to which they achieve their goals and desired outcomes and to identify the extent of any problems or barriers to success in the programs so they can be addressed in a timely manner.”
What's in it for me?

These programs involve public money used for student financial aid, so citizens have a stake in whether the funds are tracked accurately and used effectively.

“DHE received state appropriations of $147,927,686 in fiscal year 2015 and $143,016,099 in fiscal year 2016.”
The bottom line

The audit found three main problems: weak program performance tracking, financial management errors, and an outdated internal control plan.

“Below is a summary of our findings and recommendations, with links to each page listed.”
What happens next

The auditor recommended that DHE define success measures, improve tracking, correct financial accounting issues, and update its internal control plan.

“DHE should develop a complete and updated ICP based on a current department-wide risk assessment that includes all aspects of its business activities.”
Why it's significant

The audit says the public and Legislature need clearer information about whether tax-funded programs are achieving their intended results.

“This information would not only help DHE effect proper administration of the programs in question, but also provide a higher level of transparency to both the Legislature and the public as to what impact, if any, the expenditure of tax dollars on the programs’ activities has on achieving desired outcomes.”
Jargon, unpacked

The No Interest Loan Program is a state student loan program that charges no interest and is repaid after a student leaves school or graduates.

“Students have 10 years (commencing within six months of graduation or termination of studies) to repay the loans.”

3 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

DHE did not establish performance measures or routinely analyze performance data for three student financial assistance programs.
internal controlsrecordkeeping/documentation

Why it matters: DHE cannot assess the programs' impact, determine whether they achieve their goals, or identify barriers to success in a timely manner.

Standard: DHE is expected to measure quality by defining educational achievement and success with standards and measurements. ( Government Performance Results Act )

2 recommendations
  • DHE should work with BHE and the Legislature to identify a system for tracking and analyzing data as well as to define key success metrics.agency: agreed
  • DHE should work to identify any program changes that need to be made to enhance program success.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The Department also agrees in principle that establishing performance measures to assess the impact of programs is important."
Auditor: "Based on its response, DHE is taking measures to address our concerns in this area."
DHE did not properly reconcile, classify, and limit certain financial activity for its student financial assistance programs.
internal controlsrecordkeeping/documentationgrants management

Why it matters: There was inadequate assurance that grant and scholarship balances were accurate, and NIL Trust Fund money intended for student loans was used for other costs.

Standard: OSC requires detective and monitoring controls, and Chapter 15A limits annual NIL Program administration spending to $775,000. ( Section 9 of Chapter 15A of the Massachusetts General Laws; OSC’s Internal Control Guide )

2 recommendations
  • DHE should develop a formal fund balance reconciliation process comprising DHE’s MASSAid system and MMARS to ensure the accuracy of the fund balances.agency: partially agreed
  • DHE should make the necessary correcting adjustments to properly reclassify the MASSAid system costs to DHE’s department budget or transfer the costs to EOE’s IT budget.agency: partially agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The Department substantially agrees with this finding; however, the Department has taken several corrective actions both prior to and after the initiation of the audit by instituting detective and preventive controls to mitigate identified risks in connection with the fiscal activities that support the administration of student financial aid programs."
Auditor: "Based on its response, DHE has taken measures to address our concern in this area."
DHE’s internal control plan was outdated and did not include all required enterprise risk management components.
internal controlsrecordkeeping/documentation

Why it matters: DHE risked not meeting operational objectives economically and efficiently or complying with laws, regulations, guidance, grants, and contracts.

Standard: OSC’s Internal Control Guide requires internal control plans to be reviewed and updated annually and based on the enterprise risk management framework. ( OSC Internal Control Guide; COSO Enterprise Risk Management—Integrated Framework )

1 recommendation
  • DHE should develop a complete and updated ICP based on a current department-wide risk assessment that includes all aspects of its business activities.agency: partially agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The Department substantially agrees with this finding."
Auditor: "The actions taken by DHE to address compliance with OSC’s Internal Control Guide should provide DHE with an adequately documented ICP that incorporates a department-wide risk assessment for all aspects of the agency’s business activities."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Department of Higher Education .

See this entity's page with all 4 audits →