Audit of the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE)
June 2, 2020 · Department of Elementary and Secondary Education · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗
source
“DESE did not ensure the accuracy of attendance data entered in the Literacy, Adult and Community Education System (LACES) by its contracted AE providers.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
This is a State Auditor performance audit of the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, focused on how it oversaw adult education providers from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019.
“In this performance audit, we examined whether DESE conducted all program quality reviews and site visits (SVs) of adult education (AE) providers and ensured that AE providers maintained complete, accurate, and up-to-date course attendance records and waitlists in accordance with its policies and procedures.”
Auditors checked whether DESE followed its own rules for reviewing adult education providers and making sure attendance records and waitlists were accurate and current.
“Does DESE ensure that AE providers maintain accurate, complete, and up-to-date attendance records and waitlists in accordance with its “FY19 Massachusetts Policies for Effective Adult Education”?”
If you or someone you know needs adult education, bad waitlist records could affect whether people get fair access to classes and services.
“Without adequate assurance that waitlist information is properly maintained, DESE cannot ensure fair and equitable access for individuals who would like to benefit from the AE program.”
The auditor found four main issues: DESE did not adequately verify attendance data, waitlists, risk-based scheduling, or completion of site visits.
“DESE did not always perform its scheduled SVs for AE providers.”
The auditor recommended that DESE create and use stronger procedures and controls for attendance data, waitlists, cohort assignments, and site visits.
“DESE should implement controls to ensure that AE providers are placed in the appropriate cohorts and monitoring visits are scheduled in accordance with its risk-based cohort assignment policy.”
The findings matter because adult education serves adults who may need basic skills, English language instruction, high school equivalency, or career readiness support.
“The program offers educational assistance to Massachusetts residents who are 16 years and older, are not enrolled in high school, and require instruction ranging from basic literacy and numeracy, as well as English for speakers of other languages, to high school equivalency and college and career readiness skills.”
AE means adult education; LACES is the database used for adult education information; PQRs are full program reviews; SVs are shorter site visits.
“A PQR is a full-day monitoring visit.”
What the Auditor checked
- Did not comply Does DESE conduct adult education (AE) provider program quality reviews (PQRs) and site visits (SVs) in accordance with its “Program Quality Review and Site Visit Protocol”?
- Did not comply Does DESE ensure that AE providers maintain accurate, complete, and up-to-date attendance records and waitlists in accordance with its “FY19 Massachusetts Policies for Effective Adult Education”?
What the Auditor found
Why it matters: Inaccurate attendance data could prevent fair and equitable distribution of adult education provider funding.
Standard: DESE’s “FY19 Massachusetts Policies for Effective Adult Education” required accurate data entry consistent with grantee records. ( DESE’s “FY19 Massachusetts Policies for Effective Adult Education” )
1 recommendation
- DESE should implement policies and procedures to define a process for entering attendance records in LACES and implement controls to monitor the accuracy of AE course attendance data entered by providers.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "[DESE’s Adult and Community Learning Services Unit, or ACLS Unit] concurs with this finding."
Auditor: "DESE should ensure that any controls it establishes over this activity are properly documented and followed."
Why it matters: Incomplete or inaccurate waitlists could undermine fair access to adult education services and weaken planning and policy decisions.
Standard: DESE’s “FY19 Massachusetts Policies for Effective Adult Education” required providers to maintain active waitlists, contact waitlisted students annually, remove outdated names, and certify waitlist accuracy. ( DESE’s “FY19 Massachusetts Policies for Effective Adult Education”; National Literacy Act of 1991 )
1 recommendation
- DESE should implement policies and procedures to provide guidance and oversight, as well as controls, to ensure that its AE providers maintain complete, accurate, and up-to-date waitlists in LACES.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "ACLS concurs with the finding."
Auditor: "Based on its response, the ACLS Unit is taking measures to improve the quality of the waitlist information for AE programs."
Why it matters: Higher-risk providers may not receive timely assistance needed to meet program requirements.
Standard: DESE’s “Program Quality Review and Site Visit Protocol” required programs to be reviewed on a cohort-based model during the 2019–2022 funding cycle. ( DESE’s “Program Quality Review and Site Visit Protocol” )
1 recommendation
- DESE should implement controls to ensure that AE providers are placed in the appropriate cohorts and monitoring visits are scheduled in accordance with its risk-based cohort assignment policy.agency: disagreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "We do not concur with this finding."
Auditor: "We again urge DESE to implement our recommendations."
Why it matters: Student outcomes could be negatively affected if providers do not receive timely program assistance and feedback.
Standard: DESE’s “Program Quality Review and Site Visit Protocol” required site visits once each fiscal year unless the program received a program quality review. ( DESE’s “Program Quality Review and Site Visit Protocol” )
1 recommendation
- DESE should perform SVs for all AE providers.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The unanticipated loss in personnel necessitated modifications to the site visit schedule, with the result that four programs did not receive a site visit in FY19."
Auditor: "However, in OSA’s opinion, such assistance cannot be viewed as a substitute for the required SVs."
More audits of this entity
Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Department of Elementary and Secondary Education .
- Department of Elementary and Secondary Education's Compliance with the Commonwealth's Anti-Hazing LawState Agency / Office · NOVEMBER 1, 2009
-
Audit of Settlement Agreements and Confidentiality Clauses Across Multiple State Agencies - Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (January 28, 2025)State Agency / Office · January 28, 2025 - The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education's Oversight of Charter SchoolsState Agency / Office · December 18, 2014
-
Audit of the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (August 26, 2025)State Agency / Office · August 26, 2025