Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Department of Early Education and Care (EEC)

May 5, 2020 · Department of Early Education and Care · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗

Published May 5, 2020 Audit covers July 1, 2016 – June 30, 2018 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
State auditors found that the Department of Early Education and Care did not always follow through on key safety checks for licensed residential child-care programs, including abuse or neglect reports, background checks, licensing visits, and investigation deadlines.
source
“EEC did not always review or initiate investigations of reports of suspected abuse and neglect of children in its licensed programs.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a Massachusetts State Auditor performance audit of the Department of Early Education and Care, covering July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2018.

“This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, findings, and recommendations for the audit period, July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2018.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors checked whether EEC was properly visiting licensed group care programs, making sure problems were fixed, investigating reported abuse or neglect, and ensuring required employee background checks were done.

“In this performance audit, we assessed whether EEC conducted all licensed group care program site visits in accordance with its policies and procedures, ensured that corrective actions for noncompliance identified during group care program inspections were implemented, investigated all reported instances of child abuse or neglect in the residential programs1 it licensed, and ensured that all required background record checks (BRCs) were performed for group care program employees.”
Why it matters

If reports are not tracked and investigated properly, the state may miss warning signs that children in licensed programs are unsafe.

“Without a record of receiving and/or investigating 51A reports, EEC cannot determine whether children are at risk or ensure that programs comply with the health and safety standards in Section 3 of Title 606 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations (CMR).”
What's in it for me?

This matters to families and taxpayers because EEC oversees programs that affect thousands of children every day.

“It supports an average of 55,000 children daily.”
The bottom line

The audit found repeated gaps in oversight: missed or untracked abuse reports, incomplete background checks, late licensing visits, and late investigations.

“EEC did not always complete its licensed group care program investigations by established due dates.”
What happens next

The auditor recommended stronger controls, better coordination with DCF, completed background checks, timely licensing visits, and a formal investigation timeline.

“EEC should work with DCF to establish adequate internal controls over the 51A reporting and investigation process.”
Why it's significant

The audit points to child-safety risks in state oversight of licensed residential programs, especially when checks and investigations are delayed or incomplete.

“When required BRCs are not completed in accordance with regulations, EEC cannot ensure that employees are appropriate to serve in their roles.”
Jargon, unpacked

A BRC is a background record check; in this report, it includes criminal history, sex offender registry, DCF, and fingerprint-based checks.

“A BRC shall consist of, at a minimum, a Massachusetts Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) check; a DCF Background Record Check; a SORI check and a fingerprint-based check of state and national criminal history databases.”

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

EEC did not always review or initiate investigations of reports of suspected child abuse and neglect in licensed programs.
public safetyinternal controlsrecordkeeping/documentation

Why it matters: EEC may not identify risks to children or ensure licensed programs comply with health and safety standards.

Standard: 606 CMR 3.04(5)(c) and Section 9 of Chapter 15D of the Massachusetts General Laws ( 606 CMR 3.04(5)(c); Section 9 of Chapter 15D of the Massachusetts General Laws )

1 recommendation
  • EEC should work with DCF to establish adequate internal controls over the 51A reporting and investigation process.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "EEC and DCF continue to enhance coordination across our two systems of tracking investigations by refining operating procedures and designing new technology solutions."
Auditor: "EEC did not provide any documentation to substantiate the results of its analysis of the 55 51A reports we describe as not received, reviewed, or investigated."
EEC did not ensure that required background record checks were performed for employees at licensed group care programs.
public safetyinternal controlsrecordkeeping/documentation

Why it matters: EEC cannot ensure employees are appropriate for their roles, potentially jeopardizing the health and safety of group care program residents.

Standard: 606 CMR 14.02 and 606 CMR 14.10(5) ( 606 CMR 14.02; 606 CMR 14.10(5) )

2 recommendations
  • EEC should develop and implement policies, procedures, effective monitoring, and periodic evaluations of internal controls to ensure that employees have BRCs.agency: already implemented
  • EEC should ensure that all current employees receive any portion of the BRC that has not been conducted.agency: already implemented
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "EEC’s review ensured that all employees completed the process, although many of the employees had terminated their employment with the providers prior to completion of the Background Record Check."
Auditor: "EEC did not provide any documentation to substantiate that these BRCs were conducted."
EEC did not consistently meet deadlines for group care program licensing visits.
licensing/inspectionsreporting timelinessinternal controls

Why it matters: Late licensing visits can delay identification and correction of problems affecting safe and healthy program operations.

Standard: EEC Differential Licensing Handbook requirements for scheduled licensing and monitoring visits ( 606 CMR 3.03 )

2 recommendations
  • EEC should phase its group care programs in to its new model as soon as possible.
  • EEC should meet its deadlines for licensing visits.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "EEC continues to align the data tracking [in] the LEAD system through additional technical enhancements in LEAD to account for this practice."
Auditor: "During our audit period, EEC did not consistently complete group care program licensing visits within required timeframes; this could result in delays in addressing any problems."
EEC did not always complete licensed group care program investigations by established due dates.
reporting timelinessinternal controlspublic safety

Why it matters: Prolonged investigations can create financial and administrative burdens for programs and delay resolution of safety-related issues.

Standard: EEC informal investigation due-date process in LEAD

1 recommendation
  • EEC should implement a formal policy that documents a timeline for investigations and should communicate that timeline to all stakeholders involved.
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "EEC establishes internal investigation deadlines and works to efficiently execute investigations within the Department’s authority."
Auditor: "Although we acknowledge that there are circumstances outside EEC’s control that could affect how quickly an investigation can be completed, we believe that better controls over this process, such as a policy that establishes specific timelines and accountability for completing investigations, will allow EEC to manage this process more effectively."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Department of Early Education and Care .

See this entity's page with all 7 audits →