Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Department of Developmental Services (DDS)

June 29, 2021 · Department of Developmental Services · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗

Published June 29, 2021 Audit covers July 1, 2017 – June 30, 2019 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found that DDS often missed required deadlines for abuse-related investigations, action plans, incident reports, medication error reports, and employee security training.
source
“Below is a summary of our findings and recommendations, with links to each page listed.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a Massachusetts State Auditor performance audit of the Department of Developmental Services, covering July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019.

“This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, findings, and recommendations for the audit period, July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors checked whether DDS handled serious complaints, incidents, and medication reports on time and according to its own rules.

“Our purpose was to determine whether DDS completed these processes on time and in accordance with its policies and procedures.”
Why it matters

DDS serves people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, so delays in investigations or reports can affect client safety and care.

“DDS serves approximately 32,000 adults and more than 9,000 children who have intellectual and developmental disabilities.”
What's in it for me?

If you or someone you care about receives DDS services, this report shows whether safety complaints, medication mistakes, and serious incidents were handled quickly enough.

“Provider-operated community-based residential services, which included group homes, helped more than 10,000 individuals across the Commonwealth as of March 2019.”
The bottom line

DDS had repeated timing and oversight problems, including late decision letters, late action plans, improperly handled reviews, late incident reports, late medication reports, and missed security training.

“DDS did not ensure that medication occurrence reports were created, finalized, and reviewed within the prescribed timeframes.”
What happens next

DDS said it had started making changes, including monitoring deadlines, creating workgroups, issuing guidance to providers, and improving security training follow-up.

“DDS has formed a workgroup consisting of staff from the DDS Bureau of Program Integrity, senior managers, and operations staff to develop and implement systems for the monitoring of timeframes for completion of action plans and administrative reviews across the state.”
Why it's significant

The report matters because DDS is responsible for reviewing suspected abuse, mistreatment, serious incidents, and medication problems involving vulnerable clients.

“As part of its responsibilities, DDS conducts various types of investigations and reviews of allegations of suspected abuse, mistreatment, and other incidents that may pose a serious risk of harm to its clients.”
Jargon, unpacked

HCSIS is the online system DDS and providers use to file and track clinical information, incident reports, medication reports, restraints, and investigations.

“The Home and Community Services Information System (HCSIS) is a web based service that allows Service Providers and [DDS] to file clinical information and reports on incidents, medication occurrences, restraints, and investigations.”

2 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

DDS did not always issue investigation decision letters within required timeframes.
reporting timelinessinternal controlspublic safety

Why it matters: Delayed investigations increase the chance that DDS clients may remain exposed to safety risks.

Standard: Section 9.13(1)(d) and Section 9.10(5) of Title 115 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations ( Section 9.13(1)(d) of Title 115 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations; 115 CMR 9.10(5) )

3 recommendations
  • DDS should work with the Disabled Persons Protection Commission (DPPC) to complete investigations and issue decision letters within 45 business days.agency: agreed
  • DDS should formalize the necessary policies and procedures to require that regional senior investigators monitor investigations for timeliness and ensure that any necessary extensions are properly requested, documented, and approved.agency: agreed
  • If DDS believes that inadequate staffing is contributing to this issue, it should determine the staffing level it would need to meet the required timeframes and seek funding to reach that level.agency: disagreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "With respect to the finding that “DDS did not always issue decision letters for its investigations within required timeframes,” DDS agrees that a percentage of the sampled Investigation Reports, and thus Decision Letters, was not issued within the 45-day time prescribed by DDS regulations."
Auditor: "Based on its response, DDS is taking measures to address our concerns in this area."
DDS did not consistently develop action plans for alleged abuse or mistreatment victims by the required deadline.
reporting timelinessinternal controlspublic safety

Why it matters: Late action plans increase the risk of continued abuse and mistreatment.

Standard: 115 CMR 9.14(3) ( 115 CMR 9.14(3) )

1 recommendation
  • DDS should enhance its policies and procedures by implementing effective monitoring controls to ensure that action plans are developed within required timeframes.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "DDS agrees with OSA’s Finding No. 2 that “deadlines for developing Action Plans for alleged victims were not always met.”"
Auditor: "Based on its response, DDS is taking measures to address our concerns in this area."
DDS did not complete or properly assign all administrative reviews.
internal controlsrecordkeeping/documentationpublic safety

Why it matters: DDS cannot ensure timely implementation of resolution-letter actions to address potential harm.

Standard: 115 CMR 9.11 ( 115 CMR 9.11 )

1 recommendation
  • DDS should implement policies, procedures, and monitoring controls to ensure that administrative reviews are completed by the regional director or his/her designees.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "DDS agrees that administrative reviews were not always completed by the regional director or his or her designee and were inconsistent in how the administrative review process was implemented across the state."
Auditor: "Based on its response, DDS is taking measures to address our concerns in this area."
DDS did not ensure provider-operated group homes submitted and finalized incident reports on time.
reporting timelinessvendor oversightinternal controlspublic safety

Why it matters: DDS cannot act on all incident reports in time to identify and remediate safety risks to alleged victims.

Standard: DDS Incident Management Guidelines, Section VI(A)(1) ( Section VI(A)(1) of DDS’s Incident Management Guidelines )

1 recommendation
  • DDS should work with provider-operated group homes and establish effective monitoring controls to ensure that all incident reports are submitted and finalized on time.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "DDS agrees with the Finding that provider-operated group homes did not timely submit incident reports."
Auditor: "Based on its response, DDS is taking measures to address our concerns in this area."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Department of Developmental Services .

See this entity's page with all 3 audits →