Audit of the Department of Developmental Services (April 15, 2026)
April 15, 2026 · Department of Developmental Services · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗
source
“DDS did not ensure that medication occurrence reports were created, finalized, and reviewed within the required timeframes.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
This is a state performance audit of the Massachusetts Department of Developmental Services, covering selected work from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2024.
“In accordance with Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor has conducted a performance audit of certain activities of the Department of Developmental Services (DDS) for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2024.”
Auditors mainly checked whether DDS fixed problems found in a prior 2021 audit, and also reviewed whether DDS handled individual support plans and self-determination properly.
“The purpose of our audit was to determine whether DDS implemented the recommendations from our prior audit report (Audit No. 2020-0234-3S), issued on June 29, 2021.”
DDS serves people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, so late reviews, reports, or action plans can delay responses to possible safety risks, abuse, medication mistakes, or other harm.
“When investigations are not completed within required timeframes, or extensions are created without reason, there is a greater risk that recipients of DDS services may be subject to safety risks, abuse, and/or mistreatment.”
If you or someone you care about receives DDS services, this report is about whether DDS and its providers respond on time when there are complaints, incidents, medication problems, or service-planning choices.
“During fiscal year 2024, the agency served approximately 43,000 adults and children with intellectual and developmental disabilities throughout the Commonwealth.”
The auditor found five problems: late investigation paperwork or action plans, mishandled administrative reviews, late medication occurrence reports, late incident reports, and failure to document that all eligible people were offered the self-determination option.
“Below is a list of our audit objectives, indicating each question we intended our audit to answer; the conclusion we reached regarding each objective; and, if applicable, where each objective is discussed in the audit findings.”
DDS agreed with most concerns and said it has updated or will update policies, oversight, training, reporting, and follow-up; the auditor plans to check back in about six months.
“As part of our post-audit review process, we will follow up on this matter in approximately six months.”
The findings are significant because DDS had already been audited on several of these issues before, and the new audit found some prior recommendations were still not fully implemented during the audit period.
“DDS did not fully implement our recommendations during the audit period from our previous audit (Audit No. 2020-0234-3S).”
DDS means the Department of Developmental Services; MOR means a medication occurrence report, which is filed when medication is missed or given incorrectly; ISP means an individual support plan, which sets goals and supports for a person receiving services; self-determination means giving a person more control over service decisions.
“Self-determination is an approach where a recipient of DDS services is given control and an active role over the decision-making process for services provided to them to support their needs.”
1 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown
What the Auditor checked
- Did not comply Did DDS complete investigations, including their corresponding action plans and decision letters, within the timeframes required by Sections 9.10(5), 9.13(1)(d), and 9.14(3) of Title 115 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations (CMR)?
- Did not comply Did DDS conduct administrative reviews in accordance with the procedures and timeframes established in 115 CMR 9.11(1), 9.11(2), and 9.14(3)(b)?
- Did not comply Did DDS implement policies and procedures to ensure that medication occurrence reports (MORs) were processed based on the recommendations from our prior audit (Audit No. 2020-0234-3S)?
- Did not comply Did DDS implement policies and procedures to monitor the accuracy and completeness of incident reports based on the recommendations from our prior audit (Audit No. 2020-0234-3S)?
- Did not comply Did DDS develop individual support plans (ISPs) on behalf of recipients of DDS services to accommodate those who elected the self-determination option in accordance with 115 CMR 6.21 and 6.23(5) and Sections 19(b), (f), and (g) of Chapter 255 of the General Laws?
What the Auditor found
Why it matters: Late investigations and action plans increase the risk that service recipients may remain exposed to safety risks, abuse, or mistreatment.
Standard: 115 CMR 9.13(1)(d), 115 CMR 9.10(5), and 115 CMR 9.14(3) ( Section 9.13(1)(d) of Title 115 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations; 115 CMR 9.10(5); 115 CMR 9.14(3) )
2 recommendations
- DDS should continue to follow its newly updated investigations manual to ensure that all decision letters are issued within the required timeline and ensure that any necessary extensions are properly requested, documented, and approved.agency: agreed
- As previously recommended in our Audit No. 2020-0234-3S, DDS should properly implement effective monitoring controls to ensure that all action plans are completed timely.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "DDS agrees . . . with Finding 1 to the extent that the Department did not always issue decision letters or develop action plans within the requisite timeframes in 100% of cases."
Auditor: "Based on its response, DDS continues to take measures to address our concerns regarding this matter."
Why it matters: Untimely or improper administrative reviews may delay actions intended to address potential harm.
Standard: 115 CMR 9.11(2) ( 115 CMR 9.11(2) )
1 recommendation
- DDS should establish effective policies and procedures to schedule more frequent meetings of CRTs in order to ensure that all administrative review reports are submitted and finalized on time.agency: partially agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "DDS agrees with OSA’s finding and agrees with OSA’s recommendation to the extent that DDS should establish effective policies and procedures to ensure that all administrative review reports are submitted and finalized on time."
Auditor: "Based on its response, DDS has taken measures to address our concerns regarding this matter."
Why it matters: Late medication occurrence reporting increases the risk that medication errors will not be addressed quickly, potentially harming service recipients.
Standard: DDS’s MOR Overview Guide ( DDS’s MOR Overview Guide )
2 recommendations
- DDS should continue to follow its newly updated policies and procedures to ensure that providers create and finalize MORs, and that MAP coordinators review them, within the prescribed timeframes.agency: agreed
- DDS should implement corrective actions related to audit findings in a timely manner.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "DDS agrees with the finding related to timely medication occurrence reports and appreciates the recommendations given by the OSA to improve and strengthen the medication occurrence reporting process."
Auditor: "Based on its response, DDS has taken measures to address our concerns regarding this matter."
Why it matters: Late incident reporting may delay DDS’s ability to identify and remediate safety risks for alleged victims.
Standard: Section VI(A)(1) of DDS’s Incident Management Guidelines ( Section VI(A)(1) of DDS’s Incident Management Guidelines )
1 recommendation
- DDS should continue to work with providers to ensure that all incident reports are submitted and finalized on time.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "DDS agrees with the finding related to timely incident reports and appreciates the recommendations given by the OSA to improve and strengthen the incident reporting process."
Auditor: "Based on its response, DDS has taken measures to address our concerns regarding this matter."
Prior findings revisited
"We were able to confirm that DDS did implement our recommendation related to investigations from our previous audit."
"The audit team was able to confirm that DDS did implement our recommendation from our previous audit related to administrative reviews."
"DDS did not fully implement our recommendations during the audit period from our previous audit (Audit No. 2020-0234-3S)."
"The audit team determined that DDS did not fully implement our recommendation during the audit period from our previous audit (Audit No. 2020-0234-3S)."
More audits of this entity
Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Department of Developmental Services , including the prior audits referenced above.
-
Audit of the Department of Developmental Services (DDS)State Agency / Office · June 29, 2021 -
Audit of Settlement Agreements and Confidentiality Clauses Across Multiple State Agencies - Department of Developmental ServicesState Agency / Office · January 28, 2025