Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of the Cape and Islands District Attorney’s Office (CIDA)

March 3, 2021 · Cape and Islands District Attorney's Office · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗

Published March 3, 2021 Audit covers July 1, 2018 – December 31, 2019 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The auditor checked the Cape and Islands District Attorney's Office and found no major problems that needed to be reported.
source
“Our audit revealed no significant instances of noncompliance by CIDA that must be reported under generally accepted government auditing standards.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a performance audit of the Cape and Islands District Attorney's Office covering July 1, 2018 through December 31, 2019.

“I am pleased to provide this performance audit of the Cape and Islands District Attorney’s Office.”
Why was it audited?

The audit looked at whether the office followed victim and witness assistance rules and how it ran its Youthful Diversion Program.

“In this performance audit, we examined CIDA’s compliance with Section 5 of Chapter 258B of the General Laws (see Appendix) regarding the Victim Witness Assistance Program, as well as its administration of the Youthful Diversion Program (YDP).”
Why it matters

The office prosecutes criminal cases for Barnstable, Dukes, and Nantucket Counties, so its work affects public safety and the court process in the Cape and Islands region.

“CIDA’s jurisdiction covers Barnstable, Dukes, and Nantucket Counties, which include the islands of Nantucket and Martha’s Vineyard.”
What's in it for me?

If you are a victim or witness in a case, the office is supposed to help you understand court events, available services, and the court process.

“They notify victims or witnesses of results by phone, email, or letter in accordance with Section 5 of Chapter 258B of the General Laws, which requires CIDA to provide information to victims and witnesses of crimes about the court process, court events, and available services.”
The bottom line

For the areas tested, the auditor concluded that the office met the audit objectives.

“Below is a list of our audit objectives, indicating each question we intended our audit to answer and the conclusion we reached regarding each objective.”
What happens next

The report says the office should keep working with the statewide district attorneys' association and other district attorneys' offices to replace its aging case management system quickly.

“Therefore, OSA believes that CIDA needs to continue to work with MDAA and the other district attorneys’ offices to implement a new case management system as soon as possible.”

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

CIDA needs to update its case management system.
recordkeeping/documentationinternal controlsreporting timeliness

Why it matters: If CIDA does not replace its case management system, it may soon be unable to meet its operational needs or give JJPAD the information it needs to comply with state law.

Standard: Chapter 69 of the Acts of 2018, Section 89(b) ( Section 89(b) of Chapter 69 of the Acts of 2018 )

1 recommendation
  • CIDA should continue to work with MDAA and the other district attorneys’ offices to implement a new case management system as soon as possible.

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Cape and Islands District Attorney's Office .

See this entity's page with all 4 audits →