Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

Audit of Roxbury Community College (RCC)

October 28, 2021 · Roxbury Community College · Read the full official report on mass.gov ↗ · official site ↗

Published October 28, 2021 Audit covers July 1, 2017 – June 30, 2019 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
The audit found that Roxbury Community College still had problems managing the Reggie Lewis Track and Athletic Center, including missing records, improper charges to public high school track leagues, employee contract overpayments, and missing sex offender checks.
source
“Below is a summary of our findings and recommendations, with links to each page listed.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state performance audit of Roxbury Community College, focused mainly on whether it fixed earlier problems involving the Reggie Lewis Track and Athletic Center.

“I am pleased to provide this performance audit of Roxbury Community College.”
Why was it audited?

Auditors checked whether the college corrected problems found in an earlier audit, including rentals, fees, contracts, background checks, and purchasing.

“In this performance audit, we examined whether RCC had taken corrective measures to address the issues identified in OSA’s prior audit (No. 2012-0204-3S) regarding the rental process and related fees for events at the Reggie Lewis Track and Athletic Center (RLTAC), the administration of RLTAC employee contracts, the performance of Sex Offender Registry Information (SORI) checks, and the purchasing and receipt of goods.”
Why it matters

The problems matter because weak records and controls can mean lost public money, improper charges, contract overpayments, and safety risks.

“Without retaining this supporting documentation and completely documenting its rental process for all RLTAC events, RCC increases the risk that RLTAC could miss a step in the rental process, which may result in a loss of funds.”
What's in it for me?

If you are a taxpayer, student, parent, athlete, or community member, this affects how a public college manages public money and a public athletic facility.

“RLTAC is an indoor track facility at 1350 Tremont Street, Roxbury Crossing, owned by the Commonwealth and governed by RCC.”
What happens next

The report recommends that RCC keep complete records, stop improper charges to public high school track leagues, monitor contracts, and run required sex offender checks.

“RCC should ensure that SORI checks are conducted for all RLTAC employees and for all newly hired RLTAC employees from now on.”
Why it's significant

The most concrete money findings were $96,450 improperly charged to public high school track leagues and $28,967 in employee contract overpayments.

“The overpayments totaled $28,967 ($16,945 for fiscal year 2018 and $12,022 for fiscal year 2019) and applied to six RLTAC contract employees.”
Jargon, unpacked

RLTAC means the Reggie Lewis Track and Athletic Center; SORI means a sex offender registry check; an external event means an event run by an outside group, not RCC.

“External events are events held at RLTAC by organizations and groups that are not controlled by RCC; internal events are held by departments within RCC.”
Identified in this audit - source-verified
$125,927

1 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

RCC did not fully document RLTAC event processes or retain required event documentation.
recordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: Missing documentation increases the risk that RLTAC could miss required rental-process steps, lose funds, and fail to comply with records retention requirements.

Standard: RCC's Facilities Reservation Policy, the Massachusetts Statewide Records Retention Schedule Quick Guide Schedule Number 06-18, and the Office of the Comptroller's Internal Control Guide. ( Massachusetts Statewide Records Retention Schedule Quick Guide Schedule Number 06-18, revised December 2018; Office of the Comptroller of the Commonwealth's Internal Control Guide )

2 recommendations
  • RCC should ensure that all event documentation is completed and retained.agency: already implemented
  • RCC should completely document its rental agreement process for all RLTAC events and integrate this process into its ICP.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "While this system change and staff turnover are not acceptable explanations for the missing documents, there are several actions the College has taken to mitigate future issues."
Auditor: "Based on its response, RCC is taking measures to address our concerns on this matter."
RCC improperly charged public high school track leagues for RLTAC use and related services.
cash handlinginternal controlsrecordkeeping/documentation

Why it matters: Improper charges violated RLTAC's enabling legislation, overcharged users, and created risk from missing invoice documentation.

Standard: Section 22A(d) of Chapter 15A of the Massachusetts General Laws, RCC board-approved fee schedules, and the Massachusetts Statewide Records Retention Schedule Quick Guide Schedule Number 06-18. ( Section 22A(d) of Chapter 15A of the Massachusetts General Laws; Massachusetts Statewide Records Retention Schedule Quick Guide Schedule Number 06-18, revised December 2018; Section 2 of Article XVIII of the state constitution )

3 recommendations
  • RCC should ensure that RLTAC stops charging public high school track leagues for the use of the facility and related fees for running events.agency: already implemented
  • RCC should retain documentation for all RLTAC rental charges and payments.
  • RCC should ensure that board-approved fees are properly charged.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The College acknowledges the enabling legislation for the RLTAC."
Auditor: "RCC asserts that our analysis acknowledges a conflict between the language in Section 22A(d) of Chapter 15A of the General Laws and RCC’s annual budget language."
RCC did not retain RLTAC employee contract records and overpaid some contract employees.
payroll/timerecordkeeping/documentationinternal controls

Why it matters: Missing contracts and weak monitoring increase the risk of employees working without updated contracts, exceeding contract terms, budget overruns, and misclassification penalties.

Standard: Massachusetts Statewide Records Retention Schedule Quick Guide Schedule Number 06-18 and the Commonwealth policy Individual Contractors: Contract Employees vs. Independent Contractor. ( Massachusetts Statewide Records Retention Schedule Quick Guide Schedule Number 06-18, revised December 2018; M.G.L. c. 149, s. 148B )

3 recommendations
  • RCC should retain completed and signed contracts for all RLTAC contract employees.agency: agreed
  • RCC should establish and follow policies and procedures that are specific to contract monitoring biweekly to ensure that employees do not exceed their contract terms in regard to hours and compensation.agency: agreed
  • RCC should complete and retain ESFs for all contract employees.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "The College believes that the missing contracts are in hard copy form somewhere on the campus."
Auditor: "Based on its response, RCC is taking measures to address our concerns on this matter."
RCC did not always have required SORI checks conducted for RLTAC employees.
public safetyinternal controls

Why it matters: This increases the risk that employees with sex offender records could have unsupervised contact with children, elderly people, or people with disabilities at RLTAC.

Standard: RCC's HR CORI/SORI Policy. ( RCC HR CORI/SORI Policy; Massachusetts General Laws )

1 recommendation
  • RCC should ensure that SORI checks are conducted for all RLTAC employees and for all newly hired RLTAC employees from now on.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "It is College policy that all new RCC employees have both CORI and SORI checks completed as part of the conditions of hire."
Auditor: "Based on its response, RCC is taking measures to address our concerns on this matter."

Verified dollar findings

Improper payments identified $125,927

Money paid out that the audit found should not have been - overpayments, unallowable and nonreimbursable charges, improper claims.

$96,450 - improper charges
$510 - overcharge
$28,967 - overpayments

Prior findings revisited

Still a problem
"Roxbury Community College (RCC) did not address issues in prior audit findings regarding the rental process and related fees for the Reggie Lewis Track and Athletic Center (RLTAC)."
Still a problem
"In our prior audit, we found that some contract employees worked without current contracts."
Still a problem
"The issue of not conducting SORI checks was also discussed in our prior report."
Fixed
"purchasing and receiving goods in accordance with its internal policies"

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Roxbury Community College , including the prior audits referenced above.

See this entity's page with all 3 audits →