Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Audit Explorer - what the State Auditor found

← all audits

An Examination of the Commonwealth's Funding Structure for Regional Transit Authorities

December 3, 2014 · Commonwealth · Read the full official report (PDF) ↗

Published December 3, 2014 Audit covers July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2013 Under Suzanne M. Bump · 2011–2023

In plain English
Regional transit authorities were getting some local funding up to two years late, which forced them to borrow money and pay avoidable interest.
source
“LA reimbursements, which may cover as much as 50% of an RTA’s net cost of service, are currently being paid up to 24 months in arrears, rather than in the year that funds are actually needed to fund the RTA’s operations.”
Read the plain-English breakdown
What is this?

This is a state audit of how Massachusetts funds regional transit authorities for the period from July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2013.

“This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, findings, and recommendations for the audit period, July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2013.”
Why was it audited?

The audit followed an earlier audit of the Martha’s Vineyard Regional Transit Authority that found problems with the way local assessment funding was used to reimburse transit authorities.

“This audit was undertaken in response to the Office of the State Auditor’s report on the Martha’s Vineyard Regional Transit Authority (No. 2012-1277-6A) that identified problems with the process the Commonwealth had established to use local assessment (LA) funding1 received by the communities served by the RTAs to partly reimburse each RTA for its costs of providing transportation services.”
Why it matters

Late payments made transit authorities borrow money to keep running, adding unnecessary interest costs.

“Consequently, while waiting for these reimbursements, RTAs must fund their operations by borrowing money using revenue anticipation notes (RANs),2 thereby incurring thousands of dollars in unnecessary interest expenses on these borrowed funds.”
What's in it for me?

If you live in one of the communities served by these authorities, this affects local bus and transit services that people rely on for millions of trips each year.

“These agencies serve a total of 262 urbanized areas, suburban municipalities, and rural communities outside the greater Boston area and provide over 29 million trips each year using buses and minibuses operated by private transit service companies.”
The bottom line

MassDOT followed the law, but the funding process itself was inefficient and caused avoidable borrowing costs and planning problems.

“Our audit indicated that MassDOT, through the RTD, was administering the state’s funding for RTAs in compliance with applicable laws and regulations.”
What happens next

The auditor recommended that MassDOT work with the transit authorities and seek legislative funding and process changes so the money arrives sooner.

“MassDOT should confer with the RTAs to determine the current total amount of unpaid LA funds owed and seek funding from the Legislature for this amount for payment to the RTAs.”
Why it's significant

The audit estimated that delayed local assessment payments may have added as much as $700,000 in extra interest costs over the period reviewed.

“We determined that as much as $700,000 in additional interest costs was incurred during this period.”
Jargon, unpacked

“Local assessments” are local funding amounts connected to city and town budgets; in this report, late local assessment payments were a key cause of borrowing by transit authorities.

“Local assessments are money that flows from the state budget to city and town budgets, helping them fund vital local services such as schools, police and fire protection, parks, and public works.”

1 figure(s) pending source verification - not shown

What the Auditor checked

What the Auditor found

Regional transit authorities received local assessment reimbursements up to 24 months late, creating budget problems and unnecessary borrowing costs.
reporting timelinessinternal controlsgrants management

Why it matters: RTAs had to borrow money using revenue anticipation notes, incurring unnecessary interest expenses and making budgeting and new service implementation difficult.

Standard: Chapter 29, Section 3B, of the Massachusetts General Laws; Chapter 182 of the Acts of 2008; Chapter 161B, Section 9, of the Massachusetts General Laws ( Chapter 29, Section 3B, of the Massachusetts General Laws; Chapter 182 of the Acts of 2008; Chapter 161B, Section 9, of the Massachusetts General Laws )

2 recommendations
  • MassDOT should confer with the RTAs to determine the current total amount of unpaid LA funds owed and seek funding from the Legislature for this amount for payment to the RTAs.agency: agreed
  • MassDOT, in collaboration with the RTAs, should seek to change the funding process used by the Commonwealth to provide LA funding to RTAs so that the funding is received by RTAs in a more timely manner.agency: agreed
Agency response & Auditor reply
Agency: "MassDOT agrees that forward funding of local contributions would benefit the RTAs and produce an additional savings."
Auditor: "However, we again urge MassDOT and the RTAs to work together to change the funding process to enable RTAs’ LAs to be received in a more timely manner."

Verified dollar findings

Other identified $63,258,791 not in headline

Identified dollar findings that do not fall in a named band.

$700,000 - additional interest costs
$30,685,664 - unpaid local assessment funds
$31,873,127 - unpaid local assessment funds

Prior findings revisited

Still a problem
"This audit was undertaken in response to OSA’s audit of the Martha’s Vineyard Regional Transit Authority (No. 2012-1277-6A), in which OSA found that that Authority had to borrow funds to meet its expenses until it received unpaid local assessment (LA) funding, a practice that resulted in increased interest costs to the Authority."

More audits of this entity

Other Office of the State Auditor reports on Commonwealth , including the prior audits referenced above.

See this entity's page with all 2 audits →